Frameworkd not responding?
nomeata at debian.org
Sat Jan 24 21:29:21 CET 2009
Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 10:27 +0100 schrieb arne anka:
> > There are two quite different things configured there: Who can act as
> > the frameworkd daemon, and how can talk to the frameworkd daemon.
> wouldn't be a group the better solution? ie a group both frameworkd/dbus
> and the user belong to?
Hmm. Not sure: I guess you want to separate between the users who may
pretend to be a frameworkd (only root), and those who can use it. Or did
I misunderstand you?
> > Note that
> > + <allow send_requested_reply="true" send_type="method_call"/>
> > basically disables dbus rights management
> interesting. care to elaborate?
> if i read that right, allow method_call means, that everybody is allowed
> to call a method?
Exactly, therefore this goes around any dbus restrictions on who may
> but what's the diff between
> <deny own="*"/>
> <allow user="*"/>
I think you can’t say allow user="*", the user flag belongs to a
<policy>, which then contains a bunch of <allow> and <deny> stancas. But
I haven’t fully understood the complete dbus security syntax either.
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
nomeata at debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
More information about the Smartphones-userland