Frameworkd not responding?

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 10:27 +0100 schrieb arne anka:
> > There are two quite different things configured there: Who can act as
> > the frameworkd daemon, and how can talk to the frameworkd daemon.
> 
> wouldn't be a group the better solution? ie a group both frameworkd/dbus  
> and the user belong to?

Hmm. Not sure: I guess you want to separate between the users who may
pretend to be a frameworkd (only root), and those who can use it. Or did
I misunderstand you?

> > Note that
> 
> > +    <allow send_requested_reply="true" send_type="method_call"/>
> 
> > basically disables dbus rights management
> 
> interesting. care to elaborate?
> if i read that right, allow method_call means, that everybody is allowed  
> to call a method?

Exactly, therefore this goes around any dbus restrictions on who may
call what.

> but what's the diff between
> <deny own="*"/>
> and
> <allow user="*"/>

I think you can’t say allow user="*", the user flag belongs to a
<policy>, which then contains a bunch of <allow> and <deny> stancas. But
I haven’t fully understood the complete dbus security syntax either.

Greetings,
Joachim




-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata at debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/smartphones-userland/attachments/20090124/4146321d/attachment.pgp>