Questions, notes and comments

[M. Dietrich]

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 09:56:40PM +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > > Further question... what would you prefer to put the small MUX interface into:
> > >
> > > org.freesmartphone.GSM.MUX or rather
> > > org.freesmartphone.GSM.Device ?
> > >
> > > My gut feeling is it would make sense to put it into device as well. (We
> > > should not have too many different prefixes, only as much as necessary to
> > > make the subsystems clear to the users of our APIs).
> > >   
> > As long as the prefixes don't get stuffed. Currently device api doesn't 
> > have a lot of useful content so it would be a good place for muxing 
> > related methods.
> 
> Emdete, what's your opinion? Stuff it into Device or leave it in MUX?

i would like to separate that. it can't be merged because the muxer
does not implement the rest of the device interface. it just is able
to allocate a channel and eventually do resets and power on/off on the
modem device.

the current device interface is different and describes the hardware
with information like vendor, model, serial. if you merge that the
muxer would have to care about that stuff. do want it to do that?

best regards,
	michael