[OE stablebranch] [RFC] bugzilla to ml triggers, stablebranch-issues@ ml?

Gordon xjqian at gmail.com
Sat May 17 09:37:17 CEST 2008


On 05/14/2008 11:35 AM, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Rolf implemented the backport flag and auto-generated messages
> whenever a patch backport is request (changed?) in bugzilla.
> 
> On one hand we don't want to spam the stable mailing list with
> bugzilla triggers. It should be low-traffic.
> 
> One the other hand having a trigger emailed to a ml might help some of
> us, much like oe-issues@ is used now.
> 
> Is it senseful to create a different mailing list for the backport
> triggered emails? The proposal is "stablebranch-issues@" as it might
> be used for purposes other than the backport flag later.

I don't see a need for stablebranch-issues. Everything goes to the 
stable ML would be fine for me. I don't expect there are a large volume 
of backport requests from bugzilla at this point. If the situation 
changes over time, we can adapt later.

Gordon



More information about the Openembedded-stablebranch mailing list