Proxy

[Phil Blundell]

On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 14:44 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> The intent of the extraordinary members category does make sense btw
> since it means that if there was a core of active members but a large
> body of inactive members, they could "timeout" the inactive members and
> move the project forward. It also means the GA shouldn't end up in a
> position where its unable to achieve quorum due to inactive members
> forever.

That's a fair point, although (as far as I can tell from the
translation, which isn't always that easy to understand) our statutes
don't currently require any particular quorum for GAs anyway.

> So I'd suggest two tweaks:
> 
> a) Include internet voting for the 24 months inactivity period.
> b) Increase the proxy votes per person to 3 (or 4?).

Sounds good to me.  I will instruct my proxy to vote in favour of such a
motion if it is presented at the GA. :-)

p.