philb at gnu.org
Thu Oct 13 15:54:49 CEST 2011
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 14:44 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> The intent of the extraordinary members category does make sense btw
> since it means that if there was a core of active members but a large
> body of inactive members, they could "timeout" the inactive members and
> move the project forward. It also means the GA shouldn't end up in a
> position where its unable to achieve quorum due to inactive members
That's a fair point, although (as far as I can tell from the
translation, which isn't always that easy to understand) our statutes
don't currently require any particular quorum for GAs anyway.
> So I'd suggest two tweaks:
> a) Include internet voting for the 24 months inactivity period.
> b) Increase the proxy votes per person to 3 (or 4?).
Sounds good to me. I will instruct my proxy to vote in favour of such a
motion if it is presented at the GA. :-)
More information about the Openembedded-members