[oe] [PATCH 09/12] busybox: provide postrm for package mdev
rep.dot.nop at gmail.com
Tue Jan 11 20:41:10 CET 2011
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 01:54:04PM +0100, Wolfgang Hauser wrote:
>I agree for the test statement, but that may be solved by using ´the
>brackets in the long statement.
>Otavio Salvador schrieb:
>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 09:58, Wolfgang Hauser <wohauser at gmx.de> wrote:
>>> Keep it simple and stupid!
>>> So I vote for the long, readable and less error prone version.
>> I usually prefer the KISS however on this specific case I disagree.
>> The new code avoid using test and a fork. This allows for "test"
>> applet removal if desired.
>> I prefer the ugly but more "embedded like" code.
remember that this stuff potentially ends up on the target, so KISS
(byte-wise) is always the preferred way. And yes, update-rc.d and the
required inode itself is bloat, but heck, if you want online
pkg-management you have to take that penalty, FWIW.
So.. Can i please have an explicit ACK for that space-saver?
More information about the Openembedded-devel