[oe] [PATCH] wrong checksum for libsdl-mixer-1.2.9
philip at balister.org
Sat Nov 21 19:24:44 CET 2009
On 11/21/2009 01:07 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> 2009/11/21 Bernhard Kaindl<bernhard.kaindl at gmx.net>:
>> indeed, the SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz has changed on
>> so conf/checksums.ini is outdated, as it stands, and has to be updated:
>> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Kaindl<bernhard.kaindl at gmx.net>
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/conf/checksums.ini b/conf/checksums.ini
>> index 784a092..e1aac1f 100644
>> --- a/conf/checksums.ini
>> +++ b/conf/checksums.ini
>> @@ -1099,8 +1099,8 @@ md5=0b5b91015d0f3bd9597e094ba67c4d65
>> Philip Balister schrieb:
>>> On 11/21/2009 01:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, GNUtoo wrote:
>>>>> `/home/embedded/sources/SDL_mixer-1.2.9.tar.gz' saved [2690766/2690766]
>>>>> NOTE: The MD5Sums did not match. Wanted:
>>>>> 'a9eb8750e920829ff41dbe7555850156' and Got:
>>>> that second checksum is, in fact, the correct one for that tarball.
>>>> and the sha256sum in conf/checksums.ini also doesn't match the one for
>>>> that tarball. if that used to be correct, does that mean someone has
>>>> replaced a tarball with a different but identically-named one?
> Before committing this patch I would suggest comparing the new and the
> old version to find out what is actually causing this and what has
> been changed.
> If we just blindly change checksums we might as well abandon them.
> Also note that a change of the checksum means that everyone who has
> the file in his/her download dir will get a checksum error.
Suggests this is a "bugfix".
Regarding the patch, following the commit policy here:
Well, the commit message policy, makes it much easier to commit patches
since we do not need to fix up the commit message.
> For now a nack from me.
> As this already happened before recently (perl twig) I suggest we
> adapt a policy for this or maybe some automated removal (e.g. if you
> have a file in your downloads dir with a checksum in blacklist.ini
> that version is not used but removed or parked aside or something like
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
More information about the Openembedded-devel