[oe] [PATCH 6/6] angstrom: use GCC 4.3.3 for Geode devices
k.kooi at student.utwente.nl
Wed May 13 19:10:56 CEST 2009
On 13-05-09 17:18, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 04:56:58PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> On 13-05-09 16:46, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>>> From: Marcin Juszkiewicz<hrw at openembedded.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marcin Juszkiewicz<hrw at openembedded.org>
>>> conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf | 1 +
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>> diff --git a/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf b/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf
>>> index a466834..b5dbc48 100644
>>> --- a/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf
>>> +++ b/conf/distro/angstrom-2008.1.conf
>>> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_bfin = "4.1.2"
>>> ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_486sx = "4.3.3"
>>> ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_armv7a = "4.3.3"
>>> +ANGSTROM_GCC_VERSION_geode = "4.3.3"
>>> # Uncomment this if want need to build an armv7a kernel with CSL toolchain (<2.6.27 don't boot with mainline gcc)
>>> #KERNEL_CCSUFFIX_armv7a= "-4.2.1+csl-arm-2007q3-53"
>> NAK, this would interfere with an outstanding patch that Graeme and I
>> are testing:
> wrt that patch, is there a reason you aren't bumping ppc as well? As an
> old PPC guy, that's always had me perplexed..
When adding PPC support I had loads of troubles compiling gcc and glibc
due to sqrt and type size problems.
My efika is too busy serving stuff to serve as a testbed and my
dht-walnut lacks a psu currently, so I'm a bit apprehensive about
bumping toolchains without runtime testing them.
If console-image actually builds with gcc 4.3.3 + binutils 2.18, that
would be a *huge* step forward.
More information about the Openembedded-devel