[oe] FILESPATHPKG question
philip at balister.org
Wed May 6 20:18:18 CEST 2009
Chris Larson wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Philip Balister <philip at balister.org> wrote:
>> Phil Blundell wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 09:54 -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
>>>> +FILESPATHPKG = "u-boot-git:u-boot:files:."
>>>> Ignore the added patch :) Should I go ahead and push the FILESPATHPKG
>>>> change? Otherwise all the patches will end up in the files directory ....
>>> Wouldn't you be better off just prepending to FILESPATHPKG rather than
>>> replacing it? As in, FILESPATHPKG =. "u-boot-git:" or something.
>> I'd taken from a similar patch for uclibc. (That needs acks or comments).
>> What's the difference between =+ ad =.? Both work and I see more of the =+
> The + operations insert a space separator. The FILESPATH vars use :
> as their separator, not +, so no, they don't "Both work".
Theoretically you might be correct :)
FILESPATHPKG =+ "u-boot-git:"
is working for me. I'll push the =. form in case this changes in the
future. I want to make sure I understand what is going on so we can get
the most correct fixes in.
Could someone also look at the uclibc patch for this sort of thing?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3303 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Openembedded-devel