[oe] RFC: reverse the name change for org.oe.stable
rod at whitby.id.au
Tue May 13 00:14:20 CEST 2008
Koen Kooi wrote:
> Leon Woestenberg wrote:
>> That reminds me, we should lock-down (and include) the corresponding
>> bitbake version in the stable tree as well.
> I proposed that a while ago, but it got NAKed, time to propose it again?
> I see no reason why we shouldn't have a known working bitbake copy
> inside the stable tree
+1 from me - when nslu2-linux creates a binary release source tarball we
always include bitbake in the tarball.
More information about the Openembedded-devel