[oe] RFC: reverse the name change for org.oe.stable

Leon Woestenberg leon.woestenberg at gmail.com
Sat May 10 17:20:03 CEST 2008


Hello,

On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Rolf Leggewie
<no2spam at nospam.arcornews.de> wrote:

> I am concerned about the loss of reputation that OE is incurring because
> the .stable guys are willfully ignoring the official bug tracker.  I

I'm not ignoring the bug tracker, I just don't have time to work on
stable currently.

> think it should be renamed back to angstrom$whateveritwasbefore.  We
> can't seriously be telling guys all the time "report your problems to
> the BTS" and then have the "official" stable branch completely and
> willfully ignore it.  I'd go as far as requesting it should be denied
> the org.openembedded.* namespace in monotone.
>
I understand your problem. Some thoughts:

The only way to have the OE community to maintain .stable, is to have
the OE community use it. Currently, we are in a chicken and egg
situation there.

Personally, I do not have the time to maintain .stable, but I will
probably use the next stable branch and maintain it.

Telling people to report problems to the bugtracker is sane, whether
we have a stable branch or not.

Maintaining recipes that are _cvs or _svn are not feature freeze.
Stable does not match with the SCM versions and should not be chosen
in any stable distro.

Regards,
-- 
Leon



More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list