No subject

development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery path."

In the kernel Signed-off-by is primarily used to mark the way a patch
took into the kernel. If we do this, maybe we should use the same
nomenclature and have Acked-by for statements of approval. (And
eventually Tested-by/Reviewed-by, too?)

>> About a pull based model, wouldn't we need something like the kernels'
>> subsystem maintainers to share the load? Seeing that there already
>> seems to be a serious manpower problem, who would have the time to do
>> that?
>
> Not that RP says "*partially* pull based model rather than just push based",
> which means that bigger changes get done on a branch (e.g. libtool update,
> Xorg updates, etc) and get pulled in after a review.
>
> regards,
>
> Koen
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>

regards
Philipp