[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] distcc: make distccmon-gnome optional and default to off
paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com
Tue Nov 15 16:24:02 CET 2011
On Tuesday 15 November 2011 15:55:38 Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 15 nov. 2011, om 15:42 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 14:59 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> Op 15 nov. 2011, om 14:43 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> >>> To put this quite simply, I think there is no good reason we
> >>> shouldn't
> >>> use the mechanism we've selected to handle this kind of problem. We
> >>> should have defaults the reflect backwards compatibility. Other than
> >>> that where is the problem other than a general objection to
> >>> PACKAGECONFIG?
> >> It forces a choice when there is a solution where things can coexist.
> > There are multiple ways of coexisting and the configuration changing
> > based on DISTRO_FEATURES doesn't force a choice either.
> It does force a choice, since you don't want to change DISTRO_FEATURES when
> distributing binaries. If changing it is safe, then it isn't a
It forces nothing - in fact it allows a distro to make choices.
DISTRO_FEATURES and PACKAGECONFIG are both expressions of distro policy which
is intended to be set before binaries are produced; PACKAGECONFIG is simply on
a per-recipe basis rather than across multiple recipes.
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Openembedded-core