[Gpephone-devel] 答复: 答复: 答复: MIME actions

[WANG Gang RD-ILAB-PEK]

Ok.
So besides the name of the section, is there any problem? 

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Florian Boor [mailto:florian.boor at kernelconcepts.de] 
> 发送时间: 2008年1月14日 18:58
> 收件人: WANG Gang RD-ILAB-PEK
> 抄送: Nils Faerber; Gpephone devel
> 主题: Re: 答复: [Gpephone-devel] 答复: MIME actions
> 
> Hi,
> 
> WANG Gang RD-ILAB-PEK schrieb:
> > Having a number serves the purpose of differentiate the 
> sections since 
> > it is not allowed to have 2 sections with the same name :(
> 
> so why should we introduce these numbers there instead of 
> using the service names like proposed in the standard? The 
> numbers are redundant and do not affer any additional value 
> but make it more complex to search for a particular action.
> I would recommend to stay with the proposed standard here an 
> do not event something new.
> 
> Greetings
> 
> Florian
> 
> -- 
> The dream of yesterday                  Florian Boor
> is the hope of today                    Tel: +49 271-771091-15
> and the reality of tomorrow.            Fax: +49 271-771091-19
> [Robert Hutchings Goddard, 1904]        florian.boor at kernelconcepts.de
> 
> 1D78 2D4D 6C53 1CA4 5588  D07B A8E7 940C 25B7 9A76
>