[bitbake-devel] [PATCH 1/1] bitbake-layers: stop the warning "not been run using the bitbake wrapper..."
dexuan.cui at intel.com
Mon Jun 20 06:26:48 CEST 2011
Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 10 June 2011 13:29:24 Richard Purdie wrote:
>> We can't add implementation specific information to bitbake I'm
>> afraid so we'll need to find a different way to handle this...
> Perhaps we could just change sanity.bbclass to check argv somehow
> (or some equivalent way to get the current process name) and skip the
> check if it isn't "bitbake"? This would have the added bonus of
> solving the problem for future tools that use bitbake code in a
> similar way to bitbake-layers.
(sorry for the late reply!)
Thanks a lot for Paul's good suggestion!
I sent the new patch to oe-core mailing list just now.
More information about the bitbake-devel