[Angstrom-devel] [PATCH, CRITICAL] ipaq-sleep fix
Paul Sokolovsky
pmiscml at gmail.com
Wed Jan 2 00:25:52 CET 2008
Hello Marcin,
Wednesday, January 2, 2008, 12:29:37 AM, you wrote:
> Dnia wtorek, 1 stycznia 2008, Paul Sokolovsky napisał:
>> > We should at least give people 24 hours to object to something before
>> > it goes into the stable branch. Generally, only people knowledgeable
>> > about a change would approve, we need a way to auto-approve a change
>> > where the pool of knowledgeable people is very small though.
>>
>> 24hrs are of course ok. Otherwise, I think that coreteam members can
>> take responsibility of applying emergency patches. Because currently
>> coreteam's responsibilities are not very worked out.
> [..]
>> Keeping an eye of critical fixes required would be good addition.
> For me the problem is that I have absolutely no idea how ipaq-sleep works
> and does this fix is good or not. I can review patches which I
> understand.
Well, then what we expect from such reviews at all? ;-) The patch
forwarded includes description of how such situation happened, as well
as what was done to resolve it - basicly, all the patches made last
week were removed with only one trivial and obvious hunk left, so
ipaq-sleep is back to its state as it was for years in OE. If
there're more questions, I'd be glad to answer them.
> I used GPE image on my c760 for about 10 minutes last time and decided to
> not look at it in next half year. It is just ugly...
Well, each of us separately knows this, yet noone does anything
about this. And we also know that there's no global solution for this
currently. For example, OpenMoko is not a solution as of now, due to its
bloat and inefficiency. I have some RFCs in mind regarding this, not
sure when I'll be able to get them out, but at least let's try,
whenever someone has ideas for gradual improvements, to provide
feedback and support. Because just sitting and waiting for
great thing come our way won't get us anywhere - when they will
officially come, we'll find out that they solve some problems, while
aggravating others and posing new.
--
Best regards,
Paul mailto:pmiscml at gmail.com
More information about the Angstrom-distro-devel
mailing list