[Angstrom-devel] h5000 - better support in defconfigman

[Michal Panczyk]

Hi again!

I know it has been a long time time since last post in that subject
but I finally got some free time + found some info on the web how to
rewrite the buzzer to ledclass (gta01-vibrator.patch by Harald Welte).
I can do it, but I need to know if it is going to be submitted to
angstrom. The way for a patch submitted at kernel-bugs through hh.org
cvs to angstrom devel/stable seems to be really long - I am not sure
if linux-handhelds is still going to be supported... I am really
starting to loose hope.

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>  On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:25:36 +0100
>
> "Michal Panczyk" <mpanczyk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sat, Feb 9, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml at gmail.com>
>  > wrote:
>  > >
>  > >  So, h5000_fix_defconfigman.patch is committed, I'll refresh
>  > > defconfig in .dev, and I hope you'll prepare [machine.other] with
>  > > the rest of options, so we finally can spool all changes to stable
>  > > as one batch.
>  >
>  > machine.other done.
>  > Kernel compiles fine with that. Sorry - I know - one patch for one
>  > issue, but this would take me quite long. I am not too familiar how to
>  > submit few patches (depending on each other) to one part of code.  I
>  > can also attach patch adding machine.other to rest of the devices, if
>  > there is such a need (I would say yes - let's give all devices the
>  > same options .... ).
>  >
>  > I will take care of bugzilla and OE tomorrow (during daytime ...)
>
>  This is fine and no extra leg work required (doesn't change anything,
>  just adds). Committed to defconfigman, will appear in r14 in due time
>  (let me know if you think this is priority).
>
>  By the way, buzzer driver awaits rewrite too - instead of being an adhoc
>  char device, it should be cast to be a LED (which is actually a
>  generic user feedback subsys).
>

-- 
Best regards
Michal Panczyk